All about life, liberty and the pursuit of hopeiness.
| NY Mag. | 0 | |
| Wash Wire | 0 | |
| NYT | 0 | |
| WaPo | Calif. insurer’s rate increases draw attention of federal government |
0 |
| Red State | 0 |
Audacity of Truth
Spinsational:
"We were so busy just getting stuff done and dealing with the immediate crises that were in front of us that I think we lost some of that sense of speaking directly to the American people about what their core values are and why we have to make sure those institutions are matching up with those values."
-Obama, explaining recent Democrat losses, 1/20/10
Velvet Lair- The sexiness of winning the battle of good versus evil January 26, 2010
- Ever wonder why? January 12, 2010
- The decision to bench Peyton Manning: Right or wrong? December 28, 2009
- Is my dad turning into a metrosexual? November 24, 2009
- My “Things To Do For Christmas” list November 23, 2009
Hillary’s thoughts on the possiblity of another terrorist attack
Over at Jules Crittenden’s blog, where I’m guest blogging for the next week, I’ve got a post up detailing and dissecting recent remarks Hillary Clinton made about the possiblity of another terrorist attack and what it means to her – or more to the point, what it would mean to her chances of getting elected as president.
The remarks provide a startingly clear insight into what Hillary Clinton’s priorities are, and they, of course, has nothing to do with protecting the American people. Read her comments and my response to them here.
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Trackbacks
10 Responses to “Hillary’s thoughts on the possiblity of another terrorist attack”
Comments
Blogads
Disclaimer: The views expressed on this blog do not necessarily reflect those of ST's advertisers, nor do their opinions necessarily reflect ST's. Stats
Okay, great – I’m heading over to Crittenden’s place now…
Didn’t her husband make statements about how he wished 9/11 would have happened during his tenure as President?? How would these comments by Hillary surpise anyone?? – Lorica
Good recall, Lorica. It shouldn’t surprise anyone. They look at everything through the lens of how it can help them get more power or enhance their legacy.
The statement itself is true and doesn’t directly affect Hillary’s campaign chances.
She’s offering a hudna (truce) to al-Qaeda. Simply by posing the question Hillary has put the terrorists in a quandary. This is all to the good.
If it prevents terrorist acts on USA soil during the 2008 election it’s worth it.
If Hillary was half the candidate she THINKS she is, she would’ve made the following comment: “A terrorist attack on our own soil between now and the 2008 election helps NO ONE and only serves to strengthen American resolve against such savagery. And if it happens that I’m elected commander in chief, any act of terrorism on my watch will make the perpetrators wish their mothers had STAYED virgins…”
Of course, she’ll never, EVER make such a statement. It might offend someone.
Huh??? How is Hillary offering a truce?? If anything she is warning our enemies to slow down abit until the 2008 elections. Just another Dem doing what it takes to ally with our enemies. – Lorica
Amen Tango, Amen!!! The best offense is a unified one. – Lorica