Kerry to endorse The Empty Suit (MORE: CHRIS MATTHEWS ACCUSES NH DEMS OF RACISM)

Posted by: Sister Toldjah on January 10, 2008 at 10:12 am

Huh. One cut and runner endorsing another.

Imagine that.

PM Update – 12:08: So typical: They’re not happy with the results of the NH Dem primary, so some liberal bloggers are suggesting (h/t: Captain Ed) that the vote was “rigged.” Sigh.

It’s like clockwork, isn’t it? So much for the “democratic process.”

Interesting that in a year where the Republican candidate is going to have an uphill battle no matter who the Dem nominee is, liberals are turning on each other, accusing each other of voter fraud – and racism.

You can’t make this stuff up.

PM Update 2: Via MM – Chris Matthews: New Englanders are lying bigots.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

10 Responses to “Kerry to endorse The Empty Suit (MORE: CHRIS MATTHEWS ACCUSES NH DEMS OF RACISM)”

Comments

  1. TedintheShed says:

    Lurch and Silky: Together again.

    The sequel no one asked for. :-"

  2. sanity says:

    I thought the elections was only rigged if a Republican won?!?!?

    They must really dislike Hillary to be putting her in the same hatred as a Republican candidate.

    Some how…there is humor in this.

    [chuckles]

  3. Severian says:

    The schadenfreude of watching blue on blue action is most satisfying.

  4. TedintheShed says:

    I heard on the radio just now that Kerry is endorsing Obama.

  5. TedintheShed says:

    LOL…my bad.

    I though by “emty suit” you meant Edwards, as he is the most vacuous candidate running. :d

  6. G-Monster says:

    All I can say is wow….with the John Kerry endorsement, Obama stands to pick up at least 2 votes.

  7. Lorica says:

    I figure this is the death nell of the candidate Obama. Once the great waffler chooses a syrup, they are all toast. :D – Lorica

  8. Great White Rat says:

    Related: on the NH primary day thread, I wrote that Clinton wouldn’t drop out regardless of the results. She’s counting on the party organization and bosses to hand her the nomination, not the voters.

    Today I found this count of delegates so far.

    Clinton 183
    Obama 78
    Edwards 52
    Kucinich 1 (Democrats living in spaceships, no doubt)

    Some interesting things on there, especially the count of “super-delegates” who get appointed by the party bosses. For example, Hildebeest’s already got 39 of them in NY, and that primary’s not till Super Tuesday. I still think she’s got the nomination unless she’s steamrolled big time that day.

    As for Kerry, who cares? Chuck Norris endorsing Huckabee has a more profoud impact.

  9. Mwalimu Daudi says:

    TedintheShed:

    Here is a handy list of Democrat candidates’ names:

    Hillary Clinton – The Hildebeest, Hilly the Hun
    Barak Obama – The Empty Suit
    John Edwards – The Breck Girl, Silky Pony

    As for the GOP – given the widespread prevalence of BDS on the Left here are some likely names:

    John McCain – McCainhitler
    Mitt Romney – Romneyhitler
    Mike Huckabee – Huckabeehitler

    And as for all of the rest – no one who regularly pulls in less than 10% of the vote gets a name.

  10. Steve Skubinna says:

    Well, they’re consistent anyway. Dems lose an election and it’s because:

    a) voters are stupid
    b) voters are racist/sexist
    c) voters chose their own interests (the bastards!)
    d) voters believed Republican scare stories (this ties in with a above
    e) the Republicans rigged/stole the election.

    They win, of course, and it’s the voters rejected Republican lies and corruption and handed out a sweeping Mandate for Change!!! And then equally of course they neglect to actually, you know, change anything.