Sister Toldjah!
9/2/2008 - 6:41 pm

RNC 2008Update 7 - 10:37 PM: Lieberman should be up shortly.

- 10:39 PM: He’s up. Second convention in a row we’ve had a Democrat speak at our convention. We remember the first one, right? :D

- Decent speech by JL. Not a barnburner like Zell Miller’s, but he did good - he tried to appeal to D’s and I’s.

Update 6 - 10:09 PM: Fred Thompson takes the stage.

Starts out by dissing the Dems’ negativity about this country.

He’s fired up - slamming media for what they’re saying about Gov. Palin.

- He’s giving a great speech. Talking about McCain’s long career in the military.

- Says being a POW doesn’t automatically qualify someone to be the president, but it says a lot about character.

- Takes an implied verbal shot at Obama re: his Germany speech :)

My rating on the speech: An 8. That’s the most fired up I’ve seen Fred Thompson since the beginning of the campaign season. Great job. Lieberman’s up next.

Update 5 - 10:00 PM: Bush gave a great speech. Very gracious to McCain.

Update 4 - 9:45 PM: Laura Bush is getting ready to announce the prez.

Update 3 - 9:05 PM: They just showed former First Lady Barbara Bush and President GHW Bush getting ready to take their seats. They look great!

Update 2 - 8:59 PM: O’Reilly just announced that he’d be interviewing BO Thursday. I think it will be the first time he’s every beein on Bill’s show.

Hannity and Colmes is on now. I was very disappointed for Sean not taking Alan Colmes to task last night for Colmes’ weekend smears of Gov. Sarah Palin.

Hannity just made a great point to Dick Morris: The mediots have been harder on Gov. Palin in the last 4 days than they have ever been on BO.

Update 1 - 8:41 PM: The primetime line up:

9:40 - President Bush (via satellite)
10:10 - Fred Thompson
10:40 - Joe Lieberman

I hear Thompson is supposed to give a speech which will, in part, rip the media. Can’t wait :)

———
Yesterday the convention was a subdued affair thanks to all eyes being on Hurricane Gustav as it made landfall in both Mississippi and Louisiana. The highlight of the day, after calling the convention to order, was the appearance of both First Lady Laura Bush and Senator McCain’s wife Cindy, both making pleas for people to help hurricane victims (video here). Today, things will be back to (semi-normal). Bush still won’t be appearing at the convention, but will still make a speech via satellite. Here’s the compete schedule of tonight’s speakers. The one I’m interested in watching/hearing the most is Senator Lieberman. As always, you can watch RNC activities here, or via UStream, as they happen. Also, make sure to tune in to NRO’s Corner as well as they are updating often on what’s going on at the convention.

I’ll be updating this post shortly with today’s political headlines in just a few minutes.

——-

—– Ok, first up: McQ at QandO documents a nasty smear being spread about Gov. Sarah Palin by a campaign spokesman for Barack Obama and a campaign surrogate for BO:

In the unseemly lefty feeding frenzy which is the Palin nomination, mistakes are being made. And its funny - they are slamming McCain for not “vetting” Palin well enough, but are ready to run with any rumor that floats by concerning Palin.

For instance, it appears that the Obama campaign went off half-cocked before checking out a rumor floated by Democratic Representative Robert Wexler. That rumor claimed Palin was a Pat Buchanan supporter. The campaign issued a press release which claimed that Palin was a Buchanan supporter and that Buchanan was a “nazi sympathizer”.

Here’s more from that Newsbusters link:

Instead, it was Joe Scarborough who authored the line this morning, directing it at Obama spokesman Mark Bubriski. The cause of Joe’s ire was this email statement Bubriski released to the Miami Herald [emphasis added]:

Palin was a supporter of Pat Buchanan, a right-winger or as many Jews call him: a Nazi sympathizer.

The Morning Joe crew was unanimous in roundly condemning the Obama campaign tactic, rallying around Buchanan, one of its own, who was present on the set. Bubriski was riffing off a similar allegation made by Bob Wexler, a south Florida Dem congressman.

Here’s what Wexler asserted:

Florida Democratic Congressman Robert Wexler of Florida came out swinging at Republican presidential candidate Senator John McCain immediately after he named Gov. Palin as her running mate. He accused her of backing ‘Nazi sympathizer” Pat Buchanan in a previous election and said that Sen. McCain’s choice was a “direct affront to all Jewish Americans.”

The real story:

Gov. Palin explained that her alleged “support” of Buchanan consisted of her sporting a campaign button for him in 1999 when he visited the town of Wasilla when she was the mayor. Palin explained at the time she wore the button as a courtesy and that she was an official of the campaign of Republican presidential contender Steve Forbes.

The Republican Jewish Coalition has pointed out that an Israeli flag is a fixture on the drapes in her office. “I think it speaks volumes that she keeps an Israeli flag on the wall of her office,” the group’s executive director, Matt Brooks, explained in an e-mail to Politico.com. “It clearly shows what’s in her heart.”

And I think Wexler’s vicious, unsubstantiated accusation clearly shows us what’s in his heart: pure venom.

So much for a “new style” of politics. Shame on the Obama campaign for this. Shame on them.

—– LOL line of the day (for Monday): CNN’s Anderson Cooper was interviewing Barack Obama last night on hurricane relief efforts and the last question he asked him was related to the experience issue. From the transcript:

COOPER: And, Senator Obama, my final question — your — some of your Republican critics have said you don’t have the experience to handle a situation like this. They in fact have said that Governor Palin has more executive experience, as mayor of a small town and as governor of a big state of Alaska.

What’s your response?

OBAMA: Well, you know, my understanding is, is that Governor Palin’s town of Wasilla has, I think, 50 employees. We have got 2,500 in this campaign. I think their budget is maybe $12 million a year. You know, we have a budget of about three times that just for the month.

So, I think that our ability to manage large systems and to execute, I think, has been made clear over the last couple of years. And, certainly, in terms of the legislation that I passed just dealing with this issue post-Katrina of how we handle emergency management, the fact that many of my recommendations were adopted and are being put in place as we speak, I think, indicates the degree to which we can provide the kinds of support and good service that the American people expect.

First things first: Um - he actually runs his campaign? I thought that’s what campaign managers were for? Seriously - is touting your experience “running a campaign” really something to be bragging about when it comes to relevant experience for the presidency? Second, watch for a pattern here: For all the talk in liberal circles about how Gov. Palin’s 2 years as governor of Alaska are supposedly “meaningless,” note how Obama didn’t mention it, and in fact decided to talk about her time as mayor of Wasilla and he did so in present tense language.

—– Who knows? Maybe Obama’s lame experience argument will work. Gallup has him hitting 50% for the first time this year.

—– McCain campaign manager Rick Davis is in hot water over remarks he made earlier today in which he said that this campaign is “not about the issues” but instead personalities. The full quote in context actually makes sense …

Rick Davis, campaign manager for John McCain’s presidential bid, insisted that the presidential race will be decided more over personalities than issues during an interview with Post editors this morning.

“This election is not about issues,” said Davis. “This election is about a composite view of what people take away from these candidates.”

Davis added that issues will no doubt play a major role in the decisions undecided voters will make but that they won’t ultimately be conclusive. He added that the campaign has “ultimate faith” in the idea that the more voters get to know McCain and Barack Obama, the better the Republican nominee will do.

… but that hasn’t stopped The Usual Suspects from pouncing. That said, I think Davis could have worded that a lot better.

—– Here are excerpts from both Bush’s speech tonight as well as Fred Thompson’s.

—– You’re no good, baby you’re no good: See what RNC convention protesters are up to here.

—– Last but not least, First Lady Laura Bush, Cindy McCain, and Gov. Palin met up today in Minneapolis. CNN’s got a great photo of the three of them together here. (Update: Here’s a bigger version of the pic)

Posted By: Sister Toldjah in: Election '08, Elections, McCain, Palin, RNC St. Paul '08
| Email This Post | Print This |   

Trackback URI for this post:
http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/09/02/gop-convention-day-2/trackback/

Comments
  1. “He accused her of backing ‘Nazi sympathizer” Pat Buchanan in a previous election and said that Sen. McCain’s choice was a “direct affront to all Jewish Americans.””

    And yet she wasn’t the one that once said Israel should just get used to a nuclear Iran. Hmm, now who was it that did say that? :-?

    “And I think Wexler’s vicious, unsubstantiated accusation clearly shows us what’s in his heart: pure venom.”

    You’re way off base there. Wexler ( :@) )has no heart.

    Comment by SpideyTerry @ 9/2/2008 - 8:06 pm


  2. Fred Thompson taking on the Media.

    hmmm … kinda like shooting fish in a barrel, neh? :-?

    Go Fred!

    Comment by Chick @ 9/2/2008 - 9:21 pm


  3. Pat Buchanan’s been a target for the Left lately. I keep seeing lefties saying things like, “You want Obama to repudiate Reverend Wright, so why haven’t you repudiated Pat Buchanan?” Talk about comparing apples and horse apples.:d

    I tend to think of Buchanan as a little bit of a joke, but the Nazi sympathizer accusation is simply out of line.

    Comment by Trish @ 9/2/2008 - 9:54 pm


  4. Fred is coming out firing with all barrells.:-w
    “Field dress a moose.” I love it. (Except Teddy Roosevelt.)
    Nicely written so far.

    Comment by Chick @ 9/2/2008 - 10:13 pm


  5. Hey Chick! Good to see you posting.

    Comment by Sister Toldjah @ 9/2/2008 - 10:15 pm


  6. No place better to “watch” live blogging than the Sister’s own electronic altar! :d

    Thanks for the warm welcome back!

    Fred is on fire … and I’m loving it!

    Comment by Chick @ 9/2/2008 - 10:21 pm


  7. Fred nails Obama’s rhetoric for what it is … EMPTY!

    WOW! This speech is great and nails every aspect of what is right and what is wrong with politics today.

    Again, Go Fred!

    (”Not your side of the bucket, just the other side of the bucket!”)

    Comment by Chick @ 9/2/2008 - 10:32 pm


  8. IMHO, Fred’s speech just rivaled Obama’s 2004 keynote at the DNC convention. And since I agree with Fred more, I think it was a helluva better speech.

    He defended, he promoted, he attacked and he endorsed. All equally delivered with prosaic, yet effective, prose.

    Nicely done, Sen. Thompson. :)

    Now Sen. Lieberman.

    Comment by Chick @ 9/2/2008 - 10:40 pm


  9. Lieberman closes strong with a dramatic appeal to fellow Democrats. Even those “who may never have voted for a Republican” and to vote for the candidate, “not the member of your party.”

    Very nice job, Sen. Lieberman!

    Comment by Chick @ 9/2/2008 - 11:00 pm


  10. I guess this puts the kibosh on the idea that Thompson is going to make a third-party run.;)

    Comment by Trish @ 9/2/2008 - 11:04 pm


  11. I agree on Fred’s speech. This was the best appearance he made all season. The retelling of the POW story and the emphasis on character was riveting. I wonder where that Fred Thompson was during the primary season.

    Best line: There are two questions we will never have to ask ourselves: “Who is this man?” and “Can we trust this man with the Presidency?”

    Lieberman’s speech didn’t do much for me, but I understand I wasn’t the target audience. He was there to speak to the people on the fence - to the independents and Democrats who for some unknown reason still think the Dalai Bama is qualified to run the country.

    I also loved the way the convention led into Fred’s speech, and followed the theme of “Country First” with a tribute to Ronald Reagan. But then, those tributes always get me misty-eyed.

    One other point of note: did you notice the length and volume of the applause for the tribute to hero Navy Seal Michael Monsoor? Now contrast that with the disinterest and perfunctory appreciation any mention of our military got last week in Denver. Any questions remaining about which party understands the cost of freedom more?

    Comment by Great White Rat @ 9/2/2008 - 11:59 pm


  12. On a slight tangent–
    I understand how Lieberman appeals to some conservatives, but how could anyone think that McCain would choose him as vice-president? He isn’t a party member. How could McCain have chosen him without violating the rules, and why would he have risked it? I doubt very much if those who are truly dedicated members of the Republican party would have welcomed such a choice.

    Comment by Trish @ 9/3/2008 - 12:36 am


  13. Trish, there aren’t any actual rules for selecting a nominee. They can choose anyone who is constitutionally eligible to serve, regardless of party. It’s only been done once - in 1864. Lincoln ran for re-election on a national unity platform and demonstrated it by choosing Democrat Andrew Johnson as his VP. It didn’t work out very well…which is one reason it hasn’t been done since.

    Comment by Great White Rat @ 9/3/2008 - 1:03 am


  14. I wasn’t talking about the constitution. I know that the constitution makes no provision for political parties. But even if there are no specifically written rules, do you not think that there are now (if not in 1864) unwritten party rules? And do you really believe that the Republican party officials would stand for it?

    Comment by Trish @ 9/3/2008 - 1:18 am


  15. Was this the last Bush presidential speech ever? Happy Days!:d

    Comment by alchemist @ 9/3/2008 - 6:37 am


  16. Trish, I’m quite sure there’s no such rule, otherwise it would have been widely cited when Lieberman’s name was being mentioned 10-15 days ago.

    And it’s not so much the officials that would not stand for it as the convention delegates. They still have to have their roll call on both nominations. If McCain had announced Lieberman as his VP choice last Friday, he would be facing an open revolt on the floor. State delegations that are predominantly pledged to Romney, for example, would definitely place his name in nomination, and the convention would make the choice instead of McCain.

    Comment by Great White Rat @ 9/3/2008 - 9:03 am


  17. You know the thing I keep hearing from the media, and I heard it again today is that We the People don’t really know Gov. Sarah Palin. Well here is my thing. How well are you suppose to know a person when you only met her 4 days ago?? Let’s change the subject of the media’s question. “How well do we know Barack Obama?” This buffoon has been prattling on daily for 2 years now, and we still don’t know who he really is. We only know what the media wants us to know.

    I thank God for Sarah Palin, and I cannot wait until she gets the chance to put the smack down on dingy Harry. If dingy is still the Dem leader in the Senate. It is going to be a happy day that I never get to listen to that fool again. - Lorica

    Comment by Lorica @ 9/3/2008 - 12:52 pm


  18. Rat–
    I said there are unwritten rules. Call it a tacit understanding if you prefer. Lieberman’s name was only being floated around the blogosphere; there’s no evidence that his name was being seriously considered.

    And yes, the party officials would have been the ones to quash it long before it ever came to the floor.

    Comment by Trish @ 9/3/2008 - 1:24 pm


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Comment moderation is in use. Please do not submit your comment twice. If you are new to this site please make sure to read my policy on comments and trackbacks before submitting your comment/trackback.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.