
| WSJ | World: Europe Girds for Greek Exit |
0 |
| Shark Tank | Developing: Wasserman Schultz On Verge of Being Cancelled at Temple Israel |
0 |
| T’graph | 0 | |
| NYT | Policy: Romney Calls Education ‘Civil Rights Issue of Our Era’ and Urges Shift |
0 |
| RCP | Campaign 2012: Why Tuesday’s Democratic Primaries Matter |
0 |
Sigh:
PORTLAND – About two dozen women marched topless from Longfellow Square to Tommy’s Park this afternoon [April 3] in an effort to erase what they see as a double standard on male and female nudity.
The women, preceded and followed by several hundred boisterous and mostly male onlookers, many of them carrying cameras, stayed on the sidewalk because they hadn’t obtained a demonstration permit to walk in the street. About a thousand people gathered as the march passed through Monument Square, a mix of demonstrators, supporters, onlookers and those just out enjoying a warm and sunny early-spring day.
[...]
Police said there were no incidents and no arrests – nudity is illegal in Maine only if genitals are displayed.
Ty McDowell, who organized the march, said she was “enraged” by the turnout of men attracted to the demonstration. The purpose, she said, was for society to have the same reaction to a woman walking around topless as it does to men without shirts on.
However, McDowell said she plans to organize similar demonstrations in the future and said she would be more “aggressive” in discouraging oglers.
LOL. “More aggressive”?? I shudder to think of what she means by that.
Seriously. You’re a woman walking around topless in public and you’re upset because men want to see watch you? Er, correct me if I’m wrong, but isn’t that one of the reasons the “pro-topless” feminists do this in the first place? They seem like nothing but attention hogs to me. Or do they really believe that there is absolutely no difference between a man going topless in public versus a woman going topless in public? Either way, they’re just as clueless as ever, or as the brutally honest Brutally Honest blog writes:
Feminists are largely disconnected from reality.
Very much so. Case in point (from a pre-topless march article):
McDowell stressed that Saturday’s stroll is not intended to be a full-blown protest (too confrontational) or political demonstration (too organized). In fact, no advance publicity whatsoever was planned before a Facebook posting about the walk found its way into the latest issue of Portland’s bi-monthly West End News.
(“Full topless nudity is strongly encouraged,” the posting advised. “But for the more modest, pretty electrical tape will be in supply.”)
“It’s not a march,” MacDowell said. “We’re just going to take a casual stroll down Congress Street and see what happens.”
Probably not much, at least from a legal standpoint.
Calls last week to Portland City Hall and the Cumberland County District Attorney’s office confirmed that while it is illegal for men and women to expose their genitals in public, local and state laws contain no such prohibition on uncovered breasts – male or female. (Although, considering some of the men who insist on parading around topless, one could argue that there should be.)
Maine, in fact, is one of a handful of “top-free” states that have no laws banning breast exposure, according to the national organization gotopless.org. The group lists the others as Hawaii, New York, Ohio, Texas and the “coast of California.”
Nadine Gary, 45, of San Diego, a real estate manager with a heavy French accent who helped found gotopless.org in 2007, said last week that she had not heard of the Portland event.
“But I’m happy you’re telling me about it!” she added cheerfully.
Gary said her organization, which plans to hold National Go Topless Day on Aug. 22, already is well aware of last year’s flap over the Grand View Topless Coffee Shop in Vassalboro, not to mention the ruckus 12 years ago over the young woman in Newport who insisted on letting it all hang out whenever she mowed her lawn. (A subsequent effort to pass a local ordinance forcing her to cover up was soundly defeated.)
“It’s comfort. It’s fun. It’s freedom,” Gary replied when asked why going topless is so important. “It doesn’t mean that at every single moment, I’m going to take off my shirt. But sometimes it’s hot and you can take off your shirt. Why can’t I have that option?”
For the record, it should be noted that gotopless.org is a spin-off of the Raelian Movement, which holds that we were all created by little human-like creatures from outer space who plan on returning in 2035. No word yet on what they will – or won’t – be wearing.
Ugh. “Feminist” narcissists make me ill. ![]()
Flashback:
RSS feed for comments on this post.
© 2003 - 2012 Sister Toldjah • All Rights Reserved
Powered by: WordPress • Design by: E.Webscapes • Hosted by: Hosting Matters
So, they want people to pay attention to their protest, but not pay attention? Should onlookers avert their eyes lest they be turned to stone?
Then again, having seen some Lefty anti-war tops-off protests (Code Pinkos in Berkeley), I wouldn’t just avert my eyes, I’d run screaming.
I think I’ll lead a protest of topless men. Then we’ll really aggressively protest the fact that women don’t gather around and ogle us as we would if they were doing it themselves. That’ll learn ‘em about double-standards.
And I for one FULLY support female nudity!!!!!
Whatever I can do for the cause.
LOL X – on any given day I can drive around Concord, NC and see a topless male … pumping gas at the gas station. And the ones I see usually look like they’ve drank one beer too many
Excellent question!
Yet our esteemed hostess never linked the real pics! What’s up with that?
I protest that they are going to use my birthday (August 22) for their next silly protest!!!
This sounds like a Lady Godiva story gone bad… they wanted everyone to “just act normal” so where were the “move along, nothing to see here” signs???
Personal note: I breast fed three kids and sometimes was forced to find little secluded places in malls, parks, etc, to do so out of respect to those people who found it offensive!!! I never exposed my breast to the public, always had a convenient little blanket or jacket. Never had a complaint….never thought I was so important that I should protest either.
Wait a sec here..they posted the ‘event’ on facebook. Well that’s the perfect place to exploit whatever it is you choose to exploit. And she was disgusted that male gawkers came to the event? PULLL-EEEZ! That’s probably the only way some of these women could get a ‘date’..just sayin’.. I love how some ‘activists’ want to protest a double standard by exploiting the very thing they want to neutralize. Sounds stupid to me. But what do I know? I grew up and realized feminism was something that only made me have to work harder. The only person who can free you is yourself. (Some of) these women need to get rid of the bitter and understand the consquences of their actions instead of judging the gawkers who..sorry, but were only being men..
Reminds me of The Onion headline: Area Woman Upset That Men Stare At Her Implants.