Topless protesters aka “Breasts Not Bombs” invade Hillary gathering

Posted by: Sister Toldjah on July 24, 2007 at 9:44 pm

There are tons of high resolution pix here, and it takes a few minutes to load – even for those of us with ‘fast connect’ – but it’s worth it for Zombie’s commentary … view the pix and video at your own risk. Don’t say you haven’t been warned! LOL …

The Hillary Clinton for President Campaign celebrated the opening of its new San Francisco headquarters with a launch party that coincided with the Democratic presidential debate on July 23, 2007. The radical activist groups Breasts Not Bombs and Code Pink heard about the event and decided it would be a good opportunity to stage a surprise topless protest to publicize their anti-war message.

How much you wanna bet this was one campaign stop Bill Clinton wished he had attended? :P

On to more serious matters, the gloves are off between La Clinton and Senator Obama over the comments he made last night at the debate about being willing to meet unconditionally with the world’s most cruel and dictatorial-esque ‘leaders.’ Click here for what’s been said so far, and go here for the reax from the blogosphere.

I hate to say it, but Hillary’s coming out smelling like a rose on this one, and a harsh light is shining brightly on Obama’s youth and inexperience, and rose-colored view of diplomacy. I expect Clinton’s already comfortable poll numbers to rise.


“I’ll get the last laugh, Barack. I always do.”

Flashback:

RSS feed for comments on this post.

15 Responses to “Topless protesters aka “Breasts Not Bombs” invade Hillary gathering”

Comments

  1. Mwalimu Daudi says:

    Thanks for the info, ST! Looks like the event was a bust. I feel that it is important to keep abreast of the current news about Hilly the Hun. Otherwise I would feel like a boob.

    I just wanted to get that off of my chest.

  2. Ba dam bump

    And don’t fergit ta tip yer waitress! He’ll be here all week folks, well fer that matter, I don’t think he ever leaves! :d

  3. Drewsmom says:

    If I had hooters who look like the chick in purple I would not show em.
    How sick these women are, why gross out all the other loons there. hill sure brings out the worst in folks.:d

  4. Leslie says:

    ST’s right!

    I hate to say it, but Hillary’s coming out smelling like a rose on this one, and a harsh light is shining brightly on Obama’s youth and inexperience, and rose-colored view of diplomacy. I expect Clinton’s already comfortable poll numbers to rise.

    Quite so.

    I’ve been trying for years to convince anyone who’s not from New York that the Senator is very sensible, and very competent. I know there are many people, probably including some of ST’s regular readers, who jump three feet in the air, like a startled cat, anytime they hear the name Clinton.

    I would suggest the Hilaryphobics calm down, but I know that would be expecting too much. And this from someone who knows to wear long sleeves when trying to get a cat into the carrier to take him to the vet.

    :-?

  5. Dana says:

    If’n they had been named Boobs, not Bombs, it would have been much more accurate! :)

  6. Mwalimu Daudi says:

    I am going to be ultra-sexist and say that probably a lot of people blew chunks at their computer screen when they saw those photos. The Girls Next Door material they ain’t.

    Of course, if they really were Playmates, a lot more people would take them seriously. Men, I mean. Everyone knows what part of the anatomy men use to think with (Hint: it’s not located above the shoulders).

    One final disgusting comment. I think that it was Dave Berry who once said that men cannot look at a woman’s, er, gifts, and think at the same time. As proof, he cited a study by male scientists at an Ivy-league college where they looked at pictures of women’s breasts for eight hours a day for two years. The study was declared a failure when the researchers discovered that they had failed to take any notes during that time.

  7. Steve Skubinna says:

    Leslie, I doubt anyone here questions Hillary’s competence. As for sensible, I suppose that depends on how much one likes socialism, hence the three foot high jumps, at least by those who despise creeping nanny statism.

    I wish somebody would ask Hillary precisely what she intends to take from us “for the common good.” Aside from piles of our own money, I mean. I feel another three foot jump coming on.

  8. One final disgusting comment. I think that it was Dave Berry who once said that men cannot look at a woman’s, er, gifts, and think at the same time. As proof, he cited a study by male scientists at an Ivy-league college where they looked at pictures of women’s breasts for eight hours a day for two years. The study was declared a failure when the researchers discovered that they had failed to take any notes during that time

    So that’s why I find I’m oftentimes repeating myself to male coworkers and friends … ;;) ;)

  9. Lorica says:

    So that’s why I find I’m oftentimes repeating myself to male coworkers and friends …

    I could see that. =)) You would have to repeat to me constantly, I would never grow tired of hearing your voice. – Lorica

  10. anon says:

    Well, why can’t we have both breasts AND bombs?

    Indeed, we can!…now that we have female attack pilots and helicopter pilots, our enemies can have the once-in-a-lifetime experience of being killed by a girl.

    Which is probably the closest connection to a female that most of them will ever have.

  11. Great White Rat says:

    Ummmm….uh…what’d ya say again, ST?? 8-}

  12. Lorica says:

    our enemies can have the once-in-a-lifetime experience of being killed by a girl.

    I think it says in the Koran somewhere that if you are killed by a girl, you don’t go to heaven, and you don’t get your 72 virgins. =)) – Lorica

  13. Dana says:

    Our hostess wrote:

    So that’s why I find I’m oftentimes repeating myself to male coworkers and friends …

    Maybe that explains why the only photos you’ve put up on this fine site are head shots! :)

  14. benning says:

    The Horror! The Horror!:o

  15. Steve Skubinna says:

    benning, my reaction to Zombie’s photo spread was “the puzzlement… the puzzlement.”

    What are we, ostensibly ordinary people, to take from all of this? That Hillary’s detractors are stupid, obstructionist, childish, undisciplined clowns? Are we really supposed to be swayed by this execrable bit of street theater? Are we expected to gaze upon those harpies and somehow conclude that they must have, somewhere, a valid point?

    Maybe I’m just a contrarian, but my reaction to loudly stupid, and stupidly loud people, is to discount anything and everything they say. Anyone who goes so far out of her way to be so obnoxious immediately loses my respect – I won’t even listen to what she may have to say afterwards. And I cannot believe that these morons are unaware that most others would react the same way to their antics.

    This pathetic display was nothing more than a toddler picking up filth and putting in her mouth, all the while shrieking “Look, Mommy!” I do not ask toddlers for political advice, nor would I take any were it given.

    If your argument relies on floppy boobs, or giant papier mache heads, or “die ins” or ignorant posturing, then perhaps your argument is worthless. Such is my stand, influenced no doubt by my membership in The Patriarchy. But life is too short to deal with morons, or even grant them the respect of listening to them. These stupid worthless women got far more respect from Hillary’s campaign than I would have granted them. I would have had the cops tossing them, breasts and all, into a holding tank with the winos and junkies.