Union hires non-union workers to protest hiring of non-union workers

Posted by: ST on July 17, 2010 at 11:01 am

Another one from the Dept. of You-Can’t-Make-This-Stuff-Up:

WASHINGTON—Billy Raye, a 51-year-old unemployed bike courier, is looking for work.

Fortunately for him, the Mid-Atlantic Regional Council of Carpenters is seeking paid demonstrators to march and chant in its current picket line outside the McPherson Building, an office complex here where the council says work is being done with nonunion labor.

“For a lot of our members, it’s really difficult to have them come out, either because of parking or something else,” explains Vincente Garcia, a union representative who is supervising the picketing.

So instead, the union hires unemployed people at the minimum wage—$8.25 an hour—to walk picket lines. Mr. Raye says he’s grateful for the work, even though he’s not sure why he’s doing it. “I could care less,” he says. “I am being paid to march around and sound off.”

Protest organizers and advocacy groups are reaping an unexpected benefit from continued high joblessness. With the national unemployment rate currently at 9.5%, an “endless supply” of the out-of-work, as well as retirees seeking extra income, are lining up to be paid demonstrators, says George Eisner, the union’s director of organization. Extra feet help the union staff about 150 picket lines in the District of Columbia and Baltimore each day.

Online postings recruit paid activists for everything from stopping offshore drilling to defending the Constitution.

In California, one group is offering to pay $10 and up per hour to activists to hold signs in demonstrations against foam cups and plastic bags.

In Bellevue, Wash., the Faith and Freedom Network plans to hire activists for about $10 an hour next month to promote statewide candidates with Judeo-Christian values for the fall elections, says Gary Randall, the group’s president. Recruits will knock on doors and will be dispatched in large groups, hoping to draw media attention, he says.

Pierce Hutchings, a Chicago businessman and baseball fan, staffed a rally at Wrigley Field on the Cubs opening day in April by posting an ad on Craigslist offering $25 of his own money to anyone willing to show up.

The cause? To protest plans to erect a big Toyota advertising sign in left field. The sign drew criticism from many Chicago residents and merchants who said it would impede their rooftop views of games. About 50 people showed up, put on yellow “No Sign @ Wrigley” T-shirts supplied by Mr. Hutchings, and urged passersby to call their local elected officials. The sign was put up anyway.

While the money offers some relief for the unemployed, plugging a cause, even one that seems worthy, can be dispiriting.

“I told one guy today that I was fighting global poverty, and he looked me in the eye and said, ‘I don’t care,’” says Stephen Borlik, a new college graduate posted outside a D.C. subway stop recently as a $13-per-hour street fundraiser for CARE, the antipoverty nonprofit organization in Atlanta.

Mr. Borlik moved here in May after graduating from Central Michigan University in Mount Pleasant. He is living with his brother while looking for a job. “It can be extremely frustrating sending out résumé after résumé and getting no response. It almost makes you not want to do anything.”

To keep his job at CARE, Mr. Borlik says, he must hit a weekly quota of new donors giving a minimum of $20. A CARE spokeswoman says “team members” in the organization’s “Face-to-Face” fund-raising program have a goal of two new donors per day.

In Atlanta, Timothy Baker, a 40-year-old unemployed warehouse worker, says his money-making strategy has been to walk picket lines for $8.50 an hour for the Southeastern Carpenters Regional Council. “It’s something to do until you find something better.”

While many big unions, including the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, frown on using nonmembers in picket lines, “we’re not at all ashamed,” says Jimmy Gibbs, director of special projects for the Southeastern Council. “We’re helping people who are in a difficult situation.”

Right. Show of hands how many of you believe that unions exist these days to “help people in need”?

I didn’t think so.

For those of you who think that’s exactly why they exist, I suggest you talk to NJ Governor Chris Christie.

And, in addition to it being unseemly to “outsource outrage,” doesn’t it strike you as mildly odd that they don’t put more of their own workers to work with these protests? What’s the matter, too expensive? Nah – but paying non-union workers lower wages over hiring more of their own higher-wage workers to “protest” means more $$ in the pockets of the union bosses, you know, the people who are supposedly in the business of “helping others in need.”

Meanwhile, Instapundit files this report of a “labor dispute” in Knoxville, TN. Oh, the life …

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Trackbacks

8 Responses to “Union hires non-union workers to protest hiring of non-union workers”

Comments

  1. Carlos says:

    This shows exactly the compassion union bosses have for the ones who pay the bosses’ salaries: nada, zip, zilch, zero.

    Unfortunately, in my lifetime I have had to belong to three different unions. The first was pretty much a push, but that was back in the ’60s. The second was a complete bust – they went on strike and ended up taking a new package that would take nearly 27 years to recoup what had been lost during the strike. (The non-officer members of the local didn’t even get strike pay!)

    The third, a public sector job, had put the screws to the local government so bad that the local government will never recover.

    Was I glad to get the pay and perks with that job? On a personal level, yes. But in the long run I understood even then that the union was screwing the public, especially with its “impossible to fire so just transfer deadwood workers” rules.

    Unions today are nothing short of a scam to make the national leaders rich and the local workers little more than slaves to their union masters.

  2. arcman46 says:

    Kind of defeats the purpose of having a demonstration when you have to pay people to demonstrate.

  3. Frank says:

    Idea! Why not try to Unionize the workers that demonstrate, so that they would be entitled to or have to be paid the equivalent wages of the equivalent wages of the people they are replacing. The Union members that are currently working other jobs and do not want to lose pay to demonstrate. This is only fair right, if this can’t happen then there should be a counter protest.

  4. thomas mc donnell says:

    years ago you had union leaders who were democrats. they tried to use the democratic party for the benefit of the union workers. sometime in the 1970’s the democratic party infiltrated the union movement and took over the positions of leadership. now you have democratic politicans who run the unions for the benefit of the democratic party. thats why you dishonest actions like this.

  5. Carlos says:

    So, bottom line, thomas, what’s the difference between a lying union boss who infiltrates the jackass party, and a lying jackass who infiltrates the union?

    Seems to me to be about the difference between a nickel and five cents.

    But wait until the people of the National Socialist movement (like Duh-1 and Hillarious) finally get their way, and strip all unions of any power except to do the bidding of the state! What a hoot that will be, especially for the union bosses (who will have to be replaced because they thought they were in charge)!

  6. Jo says:

    Our skinny little thug-in-chief will own their butts in the end and use them for his own gain. Although the entire country will suffer under this academist turned leader of the free world, it would be so nice to see these overpaid union buffoons, largely to blame for the ruination of this country, go down in fiery flames.

  7. Bill Fabrizio says:

    If you belong to a union can you say the following sentence ten consecutive times without puking, “I live in an alternate universe where hiring and organzing non-union workers to remain non-unionized while picketing on behalf of the unions is good for the unions”!