Shutuppery: The true agenda behind feminists & their “rape culture” culture

My thoughts exactly:

Mob ruleI don’t get the chance to blog as much as I used to, but today I felt compelled to write after months of reading feminists launch ridiculous nationwide movements decrying America’s so-called “rape culture”, a culture they – get this – say “promotes” the belief that rape is “acceptable” and should be tolerated. Feminists have even gone so far as to accuse those in favor (gasp!) of due process for college men accused of sexual assaults of being “pro-rape”, while at the same time suggesting that the “default” position for anyone listening to a woman accuse a man of rape is to believe it without question. In other words, guilty until proven innocent. The accuser should be given the benefit of the doubt without hesitation, while the accused should be punished in the court of public opinion before he has a chance to make his case at trial.

Last I checked, this wasn’t how the system was supposed to work.

The latest “rape culture” grenade thrown by feminists is over the HBO hit series Game of Thrones. From the Associated Press:

LOS ANGELES (AP) – A U.S. senator is among those condemning a rape scene on HBO’s “Game of Thrones.”

In a comment tweeted Tuesday, Sen. Claire McCaskill described the sexual assault as “gratuitous” and “disgusting.” The Democratic lawmaker from Missouri said she was done with the show.

Others critics included the website The Mary Sue, which offers a feminist view of pop culture. The website posted that it would no longer promote “Game of Thrones” and said that rape is not a device to drive a story.

HBO declined comment Tuesday on the reaction to the episode that debuted last Sunday. An after-hours call to McCaskill’s office seeking further comment was not immediately returned.

The attack involved newly married characters Sansa, played by Sophie Turner, and Ramsay, portrayed by Iwan Rheon. Ramsay’s rape of Sansa was off-camera, suggested in her cries and the distress on a bystander’s face.

Sidenote: Incredibly amusing that the self-important Senator from Missouri couldn’t be bothered to tweet her comments about the “offensive” episode until a full 24 hours or more after the outrage started. Can you say “bandwagon”, anyone? But I digress.

I confess: I don’t watch the show. I don’t have HBO. I’m not sure I’d watch it even if I did. But I find all the pearl-clutching over this episode to be embarrassing for women, as if we’re supposed to be delicate little snowflakes who should be shielded from the realities of… fictional rape. It happens. It’s been used as a “plot device” in books, TV shows, and movies for as long as those mediums have existed and, in the case of GoT, my understanding from fans who are both viewers of the shows and readers of the books, what’s depicted on HBO (which has included incestuous rape and penis-severing) is actually a very sanitized version of what takes place in the books – and that includes the various rapes that have been shown to “shocked” feminist viewers.

My questions to the McCaskills and other feel-good left wing narcissists of the world are these: If you’ve read the books, how can you dare even make such complaints about the show? And if you’ve read the books, why would you watch it if you were worrying about so-called “triggers” that might upset your delicate sensibilities? And even if you haven’t read the books, why would you sit through the series for five seasons silently even though the pilot episode from season one included a rape scene?

None of us have to wait for answers to these questions because it’s hiding in plain sight: Feminists and their ilk have become the modern-day thought police, using a combination of shame tactics, obedient group-think, and mindless mob-rule to shut down dissent. Noah C. Rothman described this in a brilliant piece yesterday at Commentary Magazine:

….The mechanisms through which the vulnerable are shielded from discomforting thought develop over the course of decades. The process often begins imperceptibly, but the trained eye can see it in its nascent stages. It is the application of that perspective that renders Missouri Democratic Sen. Claire McCaskill’s ostensibly fatuous and self-serving condemnation of Game of Thrones so dangerous.

In service to the new demands associated with a culture of “social justice,” a concept distinct from objective justice, Missouri’s U.S. Senator castigated the HBO drama for daring to depict the unseemly aspects of life; namely, sexual assault. “Ok, I’m done Game of Thrones,” McCaskill wrote on her Twitter account. “[S]tupid. Gratuitous rape scene disgusting and unacceptable.”

This casual admonition would be easily dismissed if running afoul of the ever-evolving concepts of social justice did not have dire career consequences for the accused. Livelihoods have been lost for offending the sensibilities of the left’s culture warriors, even years after the supposed offense has occurred.

And not only have livelihoods been lost by some for daring to be different, for daring to challenge left wing “social justice” narratives, but college life for some young men (falsely*) accused of sexual assault without the benefit of a trial have been one giant experience in humiliation, degradation, and ostracization via wars waged upon them by self-serving left wing “culture warriors” who are really no more than modern day digital/verbal lynch mob types who need no evidence whatsoever before publicly convicting a man based on nothing more than preconceived notions and prejudices. And if you dare see some merit to the arguments of the accused? The mob then becomes relentless.

It’s frightening, really, when you think about it. Our country has “been there” before on this disturbing and dangerous type of mentality, and it’s extremely troubling to see it rear its ugly head again, even if in a much different modern form. Fortunately, it’s the 21st century, and there are various platforms in existence now that help question narratives and facts, and shine sunlight on people, places, things – and accusations – that seem suspect, much to the dismay of self-designated enforcers who have taken it upon themselves to be the arbiters of what we should think, feel, believe, watch, do.

For people calling themselves “progressives”, I find their tactics rather regressive – in many ways, and in effect they’ve become the types of activists which they claim to abhor. Don’t you think?

*For more on questionable rape accusations and outright rape hoaxes, make sure to read Washington Examiner commentator Ashe Schow, and follow her on Twitter.

8 thoughts on “Shutuppery: The true agenda behind feminists & their “rape culture” culture

  1. In other words, guilty until proven innocent.

    It may fairly be added that the feminazis would prefer absolutely no chance in court to prove that innocence, either.

    “Charades” used to be a reasonably fun game. Extremowhackos have changed it into a very confusing lifestyle…and by “extremowhackos” I pretty much include anyone “centrist” in political/social philosophy and to the left from there.

  2. Any gaggle that would make this sort of selective ruckus while at the same time remaining silent on the plight of women in the Middle East or the slandering of Sarah Palin and other conservatives has all the credibility of a rattlesnake.

  3. Not to change the subject, but Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) just made the most outrageous statement I’ve heard in years, with an all-too common attitude from elected officials high and local.

    His point was that re-authorization of the Patriot act is extremely important to protect THE GOVERNMENT!!!

    Personally, I wouldn’t give a rusty rip if the government (all levels) were blown to dust in an instant. It has forgotten (at all levels) that it, in fact, does not exist because We, The People, are in fact the government, and that the usurping pretenders that run MY government now are thieving sleazebuckets.

  4. Pingback: ISIS: “‘I rejoiced when we had our first sex slave, forced sex ISN’T rape and they should be thankful” | Public Secrets

  5. The woman’s movement is about (1) sexual liberation, (2) freedom from the slavery of marriage and (3) destruction of the patriarchy.

    With ‘Yes Means Yes’, women get all three and additionally get to enjoy the absolute destruction of a man’s present, future, health and welfare.

    What’s hilarious is that men then turn around and sign a contract that gives a woman carte blanche to destroy their lives physically, psychologically, emotionally, legally, spiritually and financially.

    Men need to wise up. Women are far, far from sugar and spice and everything nice. Thanks to feminism, they’ve become narcissistic sociopaths.

  6. It’s all about the left and their need to divide us up to get the normally unpopular ideas pushed through. Men/Women, Left/Right, LowClass/HighClass, Gay/Straight, even down to ClimateProponents/ClimateDeniers. And, unless people wake up, it is working.

  7. Pingback: Shutuppery | Dave Alexander (formerly ukuleledave)

  8. “It’s extremely gratifying that Emma Sulkowicz has become the new public face of false rape accusations. May she live in well-deserved infamy.

    False rape accusations are as damaging to men as real rape is to women. It’s time they are punished as the heinous felonies they are. 20 years to life sounds about right for those perps. Why are Emma Sulkowicz, “”Jackie,”” and their ilk not in prison for a long time?

    Laws need to change – quickly.

Comments are closed.