
Check out the headline:
Lieberman Wins Nomination, But Lamont Forces Primary!
What’s with the “!”? An indication of excitement in the air at the Hartford Courant, methinks. On to the article itself:
HARTFORD, Conn. — U.S. Sen. Joe Lieberman was nominated for a fourth term by state Democrats Friday night, but his anti-war challenger garnered enough delegates to force a primary in August.
Backers of Ned Lamont, a Greenwich businessman who has sharply criticized the moderate senator for his support of the war in Iraq, shouted with delight after learning their candidate will be the first to challenge Lieberman to a primary.
Lieberman won 1,004 of the 1,509 votes cast at the state convention, while Lamont won 505. Lamont captured 33 percent of the delegates, well more than the 15 percent he needed to force the primary.
Sean Smith, Lieberman’s campaign manager, downplayed Lamont’s delegate support. He said Friday’s vote showed that Democrats in Connecticut still back the veteran senator, despite his support of the war.
“I think we’re moving into friendlier territory,” Smith said of the Aug. 8 primary. “There are 600,000 Democrats who are going to be heard from before this is over.”
Lieberman worked Friday night to fend off Lamont’s challenge, reminding convention delegates that he stands for more than his support for the war. He held a barbecue for delegates in the parking lot of the Connecticut Expo Center to smooth things over.
Lieberman said he has called hundreds of delegates in recent weeks, talking about the environment, his support of the U.S. Submarine Base in Groton, education and other issues.
“I’m a proud Democrat and I’m going to carry the battle forward,” said Lieberman, who had to leave the convention early to observe the Jewish sabbath.
Lamont said he believes the level of support he received at the convention will send a message to Washington that people are fed up with the war.
“They are saying this war was a mistake and bring the troops home,” he said. “I think 33 percent of the people in the convention are telling people in Connecticut and Washington they want a change.”
The militant anti-war left in CT spoke out yesterday – and they essentially said ‘let’s cut and run in Iraq.’ That’s Lamont’s position, and they support it.
Defeat for America in Iraq would be a victory for the hardcore anti-war left in America. A sad commentary, isn’t it?
Hat tip: Blue Crab Boulevard
Related Toldjah So posts:
RSS feed for comments on this post.
33%? Wow! Here comes Landslide Lamont!
So MD, if he’d gotten a couple dozen less votes, though he technically remains on the radar screen, would there need to be a runoff? Or do they call that a drainage plan?
Forest Hunter, it is not an accident that the Left is spinning this as a victory. The MSM and Democrats present a Chamberlain-esque cut-and-run scheme as a winning strategy in Iraq, they want to impeach President Bush for not breaking the law with the NSA terrorist surveillance program, and they assert that the fact that Saddam was trying to but uranium in Niger (not to mention his al Qaeda connections) is proof that Bush lied us into the Iraq war. Getting crushed by a 2-1 margin in a Democratic state convention is small change compared to what the Left has done before.
Just think of what would have happened if Landslide Lamont had failed to get 15%. The MSM would be calling him “Senator-elect” Lamont.
CT is such a lost case… Let’s focus on the states where the actual event of taking down a Dem Senator will really matter.
This is really GOOD news! For the Republicans, that is. If a leftist bumps Lieberman in the primary, let’s hope the Republicans nominate an electable candidate.
While I have great respect for Joe Lieberman, another Republican senator would serve the Democratic Party right.