| Times Online | 0 | |
| Fox Boston | 0 | |
| Merc. News | 0 | |
| Big Govt | Obama’s Shock Troops: SEIU and Political Intimidation in St. Louis |
0 |
| NYT | 0 |
Audacity of Truth
Whiner-in-Chief:
"[W]hether the grumbling is about Republicans on Fox or bloggers in pajamas, there's a word for what the president and his aides are doing. That word is "whining." And nothing [...] does more damage to Obama's credibility or authority than the sense that a popular president is becoming the whiner-in-chief."
- John Nichols, Nation Magazine - 10/12/09
MSM, Dems continue to parrot the “if we lose, the elections should be considered stolen” talking point
I’ve written about the MSM’s attempts at laying the groundwork for excuses Democrats can use if they don’t win back Congress tomorrow in the following posts:
- Election day excuse watch: If Democrats don’t win, it’s because the black vote was suppressed
- MSM continues to lay the groundwork for excuses in case Dems lose next month
- Bush’s and Rove’s confidence that GOP will win next month leads the left to cooking up conspiracy theories, and a call to “take to the streets”
This morning, Malkin points out that one day before the elections, they’re still at it – and Pelosi’s joined in. These are classic examples of how, as I’ve discussed before, Democrats aren’t into self-introspection. It’s always someone else’s fault – because no sane, intelligent person could rationally reject the Democrats agenda, could they? Simply put, it’s arrogance personified.
In the meantime, some liberals are working to ensure Democrats win tomorrow – and they’re doing so by infiltrating Republican get out the vote efforts.
I’ve said before and will say it again: these people won’t accept anything less than a total Democrat victory tomorrow, and in order to make it happen they will utilize any means necessary.
RSS feed for comments on this post.
5 Responses to “MSM, Dems continue to parrot the “if we lose, the elections should be considered stolen” talking point”
Comments
Blogads
Disclaimer: The views expressed on this blog do not necessarily reflect those of ST's advertisers, nor do their opinions necessarily reflect ST's. Stats
You hit the nail on the head Sis. And if/when the GOP still controls both houses when this is over, it will take all of our energy to convince the poor souls that their “agenda” is exactly what was REJECTED.
But don’t expect them to look in the mirror.
- I continue to be amused, watching both the drive-bye media hyperventalating in regards to the “earth shaking consequences of the democratic landslide mandate”, should they win the house majority tomorrow, which is anything but of course, and on the other hand the steadfast void of them realizing that the truth is in a 6 year term, when the “out” party normally enjoys a slam dunk of 67 seats or more, they’re sorry butts are struggling just for the few they actually need.
- If that doesn’t send a screemingly loud message that their party’s empty wagon of idea’s, and hard left ideology, isn’t going over well with the electorate, nothing ever will. Again the truth is, they should feel totally embarrassed that this is the best they can do, even with all their contrivences, and a 24/7 cheerleading campaign by the lap dog MSM. Yep. the gaggle of the “surealistic based community” alright.
- Bang
- Watch out Dems. Cheney’s a goin’ huntin on election day…. *snort*
- Bang
It is sad to say, but it really looks like the Democrat party is the party of victimhood.
Not because they represet the little guy, those that are victims…
But because if they lose anything, it’s not their fault, they are victims of malfeance, the election was stolen, voting was suppressed, discrimination…ect.
It really isn’t hard to look back over anything the Democrats do when they lose, or don’t get their way. Look at what they do and say afterwards to gauge their victimhood.
They are the party of victims, not in what they represent, but in how they act.
- I’m still laughing over the Leiberman debaucle. One possibility is the Dems gain a 1 seat majority, bush appoints him to replace rummy, and the dems are right back where they started. they have his caucus for house leadership, and then no great voting power. An empty wine glass at best. though it’s true the reps have 21 seats up for grabs in ‘08, and the dems only 12, which Joe would have to consider, if he’s in bush’s cabinet, he’s immune because he could stick around for Guiliani.
- All in all, the Dems have certainly found any number of ways to make this election season, and the one in ‘08, really really interesting. If they’d have just played “centrist”, ala the Clinton’s, they could have had it all, done whatever they wanted once they got total Congressional control, and had 10 times the political clout going into ‘08.
They never had to do the Bush bash, Iraq is it’s own reward. All they’ve done is managed to endlessly alienate more of the mainstream electorate, and give the Reps thing’s to play off of. Amazing. If ever there was a case of over stirring the brooth, this has to be it.
- and BTW….If Guiliani picks someone like Condi for his running mate, he’ll be unbeatable. Something for everyone. He’d win by a modern landslide.
- Bang