Daily Archives: May 22nd, 2007 «

 

Edwards calls for “mandatory service” so it’s not just “the poor” who serve

Posted by: ST on May 22, 2007 at 8:14 pm » 14 Comments

Echoing an insulting theme expressed by Rep. Charlie Rangel and Senator John Kerry, among other reprehensible Democrats, presidential hopeful John Edwards made a call yesterday for not only protesting the war on Memorial Day, but also for a “mandatory military service” requirement to take the ‘burden’ off the poor: Edwards also called Monday for spreading [...]

 

Former Democrat Senator Bob Kerrey: Liberals must come to terms with Iraq being central front in WOT

Posted by: ST on May 22, 2007 at 7:34 pm » 6 Comments

Kerrey writes in today’s WSJ: American liberals need to face these truths: The demand for self-government was and remains strong in Iraq despite all our mistakes and the violent efforts of al Qaeda, Sunni insurgents and Shiite militias to disrupt it. Al Qaeda in particular has targeted for abduction and murder those who are essential [...]

 

“The Outdoor Chair Party”

Posted by: ST on May 22, 2007 at 4:29 pm » 4 Comments

Don Surber gets the line of the day for this jewel from his post on Senator Russ Feingold’s Daily Kos-posted whining on the Dem timeline stipulation cave: His party should be called the Outdoor Chair Party because it folds so easily. Ouch …

 

Another possible rules violation for Murtha? (MORE: VOTE TO REPRIMAND MURTHA FAILS)

Posted by: ST on May 22, 2007 at 4:14 pm » 8 Comments

This guy just can’t seem to stay out of hot water, can he? Rep. John Murtha (D-Pa.) submitted an earmark certification letter for the National Drug Intelligence Center (NDIC) May 1, more than five weeks after the Intelligence Committee’s deadline and the day before the panel marked up its authorization bill, according to copies of [...]

 

Carter: My remarks about Bush were “careless”

Posted by: ST on May 22, 2007 at 11:41 am » 6 Comments

Riiiight. Actually, he’s said and done far worse than the recent comments he made about the President. Will we be getting a clarification on those, too? Nah …