If Foley were convicted of [insert sex charge here] and Bush pardoned him …

…. how would the Democrats react?

Afterall, Bill Clinton pardoned sex offender and former Illinois Congressman Mel Reynolds, right? Anyone remember the massive wave of outrage expressed by Dems after he did it?

I don’t either. But you know it would happen in this case, considering their reaction to the Foley emails and IMs.

And just for the record, if Foley gets convicted of inappropriate conduct with a minor, I hope he gets served with the stiffest (no pun intended) of punishments and does NOT get a pardon. In fact, if he does get convicted of anything, I’m almost certain that Bush wouldn’t pardon him.

Just for kicks, let’s take a look at what the Snopes page has to say about Clinton’s pardon of Mel Reynolds:

Claim: An ex-congressman who had sex with a subordinate won clemency from a president who had sex with a subordinate, then was hired by a clergyman who had sex with a subordinate.

Status: True.

Example: [Collected on the Internet, 2001]

Jessie Jackson has added former Chicago democratic congressman Mel Reynolds to the Rainbow/PUSH Coalition’s payroll. Reynolds was among the 176 criminals excused in President Clinton’s last-minute forgiveness spree. Reynolds received a commutation of his six-and-a-half-year federal sentence for 15 convictions of wire fraud, bank fraud & lies to the Federal Election Commission. He is more notorious; however, for concurrently serving five years for sleeping with an underage campaign volunteer.

This is a first in American politics: An ex-congressman who had sex with a subordinate won clemency from a president who had sex with a subordinate, then was hired by a clergyman who had sex with a subordinate.

His new job? Youth counselor.

Origins: We can’t say with absolute certainty that what’s described above is “a first in American politics,” since the sexual peccadilloes of American politicians were not always as widely publicized as they are now, but the gist of the piece is true (although it originally circulated back in 2001, so it now references events that occurred several years ago and not ones that happened just recently):

  • 1995-1997: President Bill Clinton’s sexual escapades with Monica Lewinsky, then a 21-year-old unpaid White House intern working in the office of Leon Panetta, Clinton’s Chief of Staff, hardly need recounting to anyone who hasn’t spent the last eight years on Mars.
  • January 2001: The National Enquirer revealed that Jesse Jackson had been carrying on a four-year affair with Karin L. Stanford, a 39-year-old former aide with his Rainbow/PUSH Coalition staff, and that Jackson had fathered the child Stanford bore in May 1999. (Jackson has been married since 1963.)
  • January 2001: Just before leaving office, President Clinton (at the urging of Jesse Jackson, among others) commuted the sentence of former Illinois congressman Mel Reynolds, who had spent 30 months in a state prison for having sex with a 16-year-old campaign volunteer and was serving a five-year sentence in federal prison for lying to obtain loans and illegally diverting campaign money for personal use.
  • January 2001: The Chicago Sun-Times reported that former congressman Mel Reynolds would be working as the community development director of Salem Baptist Church in south-side Chicago, and as a consultant for Jesse Jackson’s Rainbow/PUSH Coalition, trying to decrease the number of young African-Americans going to prison. (Reynolds’ position would be more accurately characterized as that of an advisor on prison reform rather than a “Youth counselor,” however.)

I swear you cannot make this stuff up.

Thanks to reader DS for the link and memory refresher.

BTW, here’s the latest development on the Foley scandal: his lawyer is claiming Foley was sexually abused as a child – by a priest. Here we go.

Update I: I’m with Captain Ed on Foley’s lawyer’s ‘revelation.’

Update II:FFF“?

Update III: Lorie Byrd blogs about a Democratic phone sex scandal regarding Democrat congressional candidate Mike Arcuri (NY).

Update IV: Orin Kerr at the Volokh Conspiracy law blog writes about the legal issues related to the Foley case. (Hat tip: Instapundit)

Update: I would not want to be Foley’s lawyer.


Comments are closed.