Is godfather of the blogosphere Glenn Reynolds the “right’s Ward Churchill”?
Is this guy playing with a full deck? Methinks not.
Is this guy playing with a full deck? Methinks not.
The anti-war rhetoric of the anti-war Democratic party escalates:
Love the name of NRO’s newest blog devoted to, what else, ‘global warming’ 🙂 Peter Suderman wrote in the opening post:
On the heels of Dem presidential contender Senator Obama’s SC visit, another presidential hopeful – Senator Hillary Clinton – was in Columbia, SC yesterday pandering to about 1,500 people at Allen University. The university, as the AP describes it, is an historically black college. One ‘issue’ Senator Clinton brought up was the Confederate flag, which has been the subject of ongoing controversy in SC to the point that the NAACP’s long-standing boycott on SC is still in effect. Hillary is against the flag being displayed on Statehouse grounds (it used to be displayed on the Statehouse dome), and one of the reasons she’s against it will surprise you:
Paul Kane at the WaPo’s Capitol Briefing blog has the details:
Prior to the election, the American people were promised by Democrats hoping to get elected or re-elected or Dems who were trying to help out either that we needed a ‘change in course’ in Iraq. That ‘change in course’ was a bit mysterious on its face, because the Democrats never really clearly defined what that ‘change in course’ was. The Dems read the polls, saw that Americans were unsatisfied with how the Iraq war was going, and told potential supporters ‘we’ll change the course in Iraq’, which, to the casual follower of politics sounds like ‘they’re gonna take us from losing to winning.’