Justice Ginsburg: An all-female SCOTUS would’ve ruled differently on #HobbyLobby
The shameful judicial advocacy of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg continues:
The shameful judicial advocacy of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg continues:
Because religious freedom sucks and stuff – and so do the “five white guys” on the Supreme Court. Via The Hill:
Considering the depth of ignorance on display here, it’s astonishing how high this woman has risen in power in Congress over the last couple of decades. Then again, maybe not, considering how Democrats think and operate:
Losing it in more ways than one. Via ABC News:
I had a million things going on today so I wasn’t around much in the immediate aftermath of today’s Supreme Court ruling on the Hobby Lobby case, but it was pretty predictable how the left would react if the court didn’t rule in favor of the Obama administration’s position on the so-called “birth control mandate.” Just to recap, the court ruled in favor of Hobby Lobby’s position:
As I noted yesterday, the Supreme Court is expected to announce today their verdict in the Hobby Lobby religious freedom case, which pits the family-owned company against the Obama administration’s Obamacare “birth control mandate.” The Hill provides a preview of what’s ahead: