If the NYTimes had been around in 1775 …
… these headlines are what you would have been reading.
… these headlines are what you would have been reading.
In a rare joint move, the editors of the LAT and NYT (Dean Baquet and Bill Keller, respectively) have an editorial posted in today’s New York Times (and I’m sure it’s in the LA Times as well) which tries to answer the question: “when do we publish a secret?”
The 500 munitions that were found throughout Iraq after the 2003 invasion really WERE dangerous and DO meet the criteria to be considered a WMD, contrary to the beliefs of liberals who still cling to the belief that “Bush lied!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! about WMD:
Could Bush and Rumsfeld be tried for war crimes as a result of the USSC ruling on Hamden? This liberal articulates the hope that most of the Bush-hating wing of the Democratic party can’t express so eloquently: