WASHINGTON, Aug. 29 — Richard L. Armitage, a former deputy secretary of state, has acknowledged that he was the person whose conversation with a columnist in 2003 prompted a long, politically laden criminal investigation in what became known as the C.I.A. leak case, a lawyer involved in the case said on Tuesday.
Mr. Armitage did not return calls for comment. But the lawyer and other associates of Mr. Armitage have said he has confirmed that he was the initial and primary source for the columnist, Robert D. Novak, whose column of July 14, 2003, identified Valerie Wilson as a Central Intelligence Agency officer.
The identification of Mr. Armitage as the original leaker to Mr. Novak ends what has been a tantalizing mystery. In recent months, however, Mr. Armitage’s role had become clear to many, and it was recently reported by Newsweek magazine and The Washington Post.
In the accounts by the lawyer and associates, Mr. Armitage disclosed casually [emphasis added by ST] to Mr. Novak that Ms. Wilson worked for the C.I.A. at the end of an interview in his State Department office. Mr. Armitage knew that, the accounts continue, because he had seen a written memorandum by Under Secretary of State Marc Grossman.
Are you listening, Joe? What say ye in response?
Read more via Tom Maguire, who dissects the NYTimes piece.
Cassandra has a nice write up on all this as well.
Related: The Investor’s Business Daily Journal asks: Did Special Prosecutor Fitzgerald Lie?
- Bob Novak reveals Plame source
- Rove won’t be indicted
- Joe Wilson: A man of class and integrity (not really)
- Former WaPo exec. editor Ben Bradlee: Woodward’s source may be Armitage
- Latest speculation on Plamegate leak – re: Woodward and Armitage
- Plamegate: Woodward testifies
- Plamegate: Has perception become reality?