Anti- #SB5 HuffPo “feminist” urges “sex strike” for TX women against #prolife men

Posted by: ST on July 1, 2013 at 7:29 pm

If I had a dime for every time I’d heard about so-called “feminists” using this modern-day crap tactic against men who “vote against their interests”, I could retire.  In response to the war over TX pro-life bill SB5,  feminist Vivian Norris writes at the Huffington Post (bolded emphasis added by me):

“A sex strike, sometimes called a sex boycott, is a strike, a method of non-violent resistance in which one or multiple persons refrain from sex with their partner(s) to achieve certain goals. It is a form of temporary sexual abstinence. Sex strikes have been used to protest many issues, from water resources to employment equity.” (Wikipedia)

In Kenya, when violence broke out after political elections a few years back, the women in Kenya stopped having sex with the men until the violence ended. Guess what? The men quit fighting one another. We’ve all been there, attracted to that man who does not mean well for us. We sure would not want our daughters dating or married to these kinds of guys who think they should decide what is best for women. How perfectly patriarchal, these Texas men trying to not hear what women want have shown themselves to be, but how incredibly out of touch with today’s reality. Women of Texas, it’s going to be a long hot summer — make sure the men who do not deeply respect and support women feel it.

As a native Texan, and someone who has survived 100-plus-degree temperatures for many summers, I can tell you, this summer in Texas is surely going to be hotter than usual. Sultry, sweaty summers can be made much nicer when good old-fashioned sex is part of the picture. But women, take heed: Don’t give in if your man, boyfriend, husband, toyboy is not voting for your best interests, your reproductive health — do not sleep with that man! I don’t care how cute or charming he is! I don’t care if he is your husband of many years. Resist! Go swimming! Meditate!

Do not make him dinner, do not go fetch him a cold beer from the fridge, do not iron that shirt, hell, do not change that diaper… do not make his life a little nicer this summer if he does not “get it” and learn to respect women! Instead, volunteer some time for senators like Wendy Davis, go with a group of women to Austin and make your voices heard. Get on the computer and the social networks and organize.

Remember that you live in a state where it would not be unusual (and I have seen it) to see a bumper sticker on a pickup truck which reads, “My Wife Yes, My Dog Maybe, My Gun Never.” Remember what happened last time when a Texas good ole boy governor took that patriarchy all the way to become President of the United States. Stop the damage now and take back Texas.

And here you thought that feminism meant that women weren’t supposed to objectify themselves by way of using their bodies as sexual weapons against men?  Oh, wait – you probably also thought it meant that it was a movement designed to have us recognized for our brains and contributions to society instead of us just being judged by our lady parts, right?  Well, First Wave feminism was like that, anyway, but “modern” or “Second Wave” feminists have turned true, traditional feminism on its ear and have changed the rules on us.  Now, it’s all about viewing women as walking vaginas – we are all the sum total of our lady parts, and if you’re pro-life aka against having little baby parts sucked out of a woman’s body piece by bloody piece, well then you are ANTI-WOMAN, dammit!  And that doesn’t just go for men, either – yours truly is “anti-woman” even though I AM a woman, simply because I think we as a nation have a moral obligation to protect the most innocent and vulnerable life of all: unborn life.

I’m always amazed at feminists who believe that sex should be given as a “reward” for “good behavior” and “withheld” when disagreement in relationships occur. Why, it’s almost as if these women are ok with objectifying themselves in order to get their significant others to believe a certain way:  If you do, guys, they’ll submit to you, but if you don’t, forget about it! It’s almost as if these women believe sex is a chore, as a commodity to be bartered based on what you’re willing to give in return.  You know what they say about that sort of thing on the street, right?  (snickers)

These sorts of “guycotts”  also implicitly assume that guys are suck mindless, one-track-minded horndogs  that they’ll genuinely switch their viewpoints in order to be able to sleep with their significant others again.  So much for mutual respect of the sexes! But we knew that about modern day feminism, anyway.

Sex is supposed to be something that is mutually pleasurable, based on a combination of physical, emotional, and spiritual (etc) attractions/connections,  and sex strikes over abortion tell me that the priorities of these advocates are more concerned with the “right” to destroy an unborn life limb from limb than they are with their respective marriages/relationships.  And that’s really, really sad.  Almost equally sad is that this woman really believes the “sex strike” in Kenya in 2009 actually got warring factions there to get along. So much fail, so little time to address.

But, hey, as I’ve said before, one good thing to come out of feminists calling for sex strikes is that such campaigns temporarily halt the possibility they’ll reproduce:

How about the more militant “sex striker” gals on the left extend the time frame beyond May 5th to, oh, I dunno – indefinitely, no matter whether or not they “win” the manufactured war they started?  As we all know, abstinence is the most sure fire way of preventing pregnancy, and if these gals don’t reproduce, that means a better likelihood of less liberals inhabiting America some 18-20 years from now.  By the same token, conservative wives – get busy during this time frame! Because, well, I’m sure you get the point …

Well …? ;)

Sex strike

I encourage liberal women to abstain from sex as long and as often as possible …
(Photo via the 2012 ”feminist” sex strike campaign)

Related: Via Twitchy Team – Projection on steroids: Wendy Davis decries those who use abortion issue to boost own political aspirations

RSS feed for comments on this post.


15 Responses to “Anti- #SB5 HuffPo “feminist” urges “sex strike” for TX women against #prolife men”


  1. A_Dumas says:

    Women denying sex? They already have this; it’s called marriage…

  2. Those women should heed the warning contained in the old adage, “A husband is like a fire in a fireplace. If left unattended, they go out.”

  3. caroline says:

    They’ll have to stay home and pet their pussies. . . cats. . . .

  4. ALman says:

    And, “they go out” more easily today than, say in the 50’s, when the “cut off” maneuver had much more impact.

    The more I think about what’s taking place in this country I’m convinced it’s having the equivalent of a “nervous breakdown.”

  5. Mwalimu Daudi says:

    In Kenya, when violence broke out after political elections a few years back, the women in Kenya stopped having sex with the men until the violence ended. Guess what? The men quit fighting one another.

    I suppose Norris also thinks WWII ended because Eva Braun wasn’t giving Adolph any nookie-nookie. Talk about being self-absorbed!

    Actually, the violence in Kenya “ended” because (1) the authorities stepped in with their usual heavy-handed tactics, (2) the faction that won began to run out of easy targets, and (3) the Western media lost interest.

    A great deal of important things go on in the US and around the world that are missed by the media because their reporters are (pick one or more of the following) lazy, bored, uninterested, or lack the brains to realize the significance.

  6. Bill says:

    Actually this is a great idea. Just imagine how many innocents will not be aborted if this were in place. Folks that want babies (hence families) will procreate and those who just want a fun time will not. I am in full favor of these women, who don’t want to take responsibility for their “fun”, to keep their legs closed.

  7. This is what liberal men get for marrying these leftist feminist types. I say it serves them right!

  8. OldTexan says:

    Oh crap, being an old married Texan married to a woman who is against abortion I guess the only problem we have is old age but that is OK because we love each other. She still loves me and tells me to pay attention and take my time and don’t just play grab ass if we are going to make love. Having sex is not making love and dogs, cats, rabbits and other critters can have sex. Making love and bonding as a couple and building and maintaining a family and continuing to rejoice in a close relationship is not a contest of wills.

    Killing unborn kids also is not good for our diversified Texas culture and withholding sex to win hearts and minds over to killing more babies sounds stupid to me. That’s all I have to say about that.

  9. Robert Mead says:

    Such a message is sad. As a man of God to tell women to deny husbands the right that God ordained for both, for them to become one is to refuse pleasure for themselves. Kind of a strange message. Is it because you want to force your mentality on others? My question would be “when does LIFE begin then? Jeremiah 1:5 Would like to hear how one person can deny the survival of an unprotected being inside of them. Acts 4:12 Good day. Ask any question you desire. God wants to spend eternity with you. But YOU must come to terms with HIM.

  10. @Mwalimu Dawdi–Good point. Notice the stories most prominent surrounding NSA were broken by The Guardian (UK) and Der Spiegel (Germany) and not the US “drive-by media” as Rush calls them.

    This is what happens when the corrupt media picks sides in political issues instead of objectively reporting the news.

  11. I’m always amazed at feminists who believe that sex should be given as a “reward” for “good behavior” and “withheld” when disagreement in relationships occur.

    No surprise here. Remember that they think of themselves as being intellectually and morally superior to all men, and to all non-feminists, and to all non-leftists. Therefore, they’re unbound by any moral or ethical consideration when dealing with us lowly, barely sentient creatures. We might as well be pets, or perhaps houseplants to be turned this way and that in the sun.

  12. Robyn says:

    Great idea! Theses radical, Nazi feminists should not be servicing any male,at anytime, period. They have no respect for men anyway. Great way to prevent unwanted pregnancies! Thanks!

  13. Tango says:

    Seems to me that God gets the final word on this subject:

    …”each man should have relations with his own wife and each woman with her own husband. A husband should give to his wife her sexual rights, and likewise a wife to her husband. It is not the wife who has the rights to her own body, but the husband. In the same way, it is not the husband who has the rights to his own body, but the wife. Do not deprive each other, except by mutual agreement for a specified time….”

  14. LoopTheLup says:

    … I wonder if they realize that Lysistrata was supposed to be satire …