LA mayor apologizes for not being a moral relativist

Posted by: Sister Toldjah on August 8, 2006 at 12:04 am

This is unbelievable. Via AP:

Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa has apologized to Muslim leaders who accused him of taking Israel’s side in the violence in Lebanon by going to a pro-Israel rally and ignoring their invitations to interfaith peace vigils.

Villaraigosa met with 10 Muslim leaders Sunday and explained that a mix-up by his staff had prevented him from seeing their invitations, said his spokeswoman, Janelle Erickson.

“The mayor did apologize that the staff didn’t place the meeting on his schedule sooner,” said Erickson, describing Sunday’s hour-long discussion as “open and friendly.”

Villaraigosa called the meeting after the Muslim leaders held a news conference Friday accusing him of not representing all groups touched by the conflict.

They noted that he attended a July 23 rally by the Jewish Federation of Greater Los Angeles, at which he condemned Hezbollah guerrilla rocket attacks on Israel, but failed to respond to repeated calls and e-mail invitations to interfaith vigils for people killed on both sides in Lebanon.

“It was gracious of him to say ‘I apologize for the lack of communications,’” said Shakeel Syed, executive director of the Shura Council of Southern California.

The mayor pledged to visit mosques and attend events in the city’s Islamic communities, and assigned one of his senior advisors as liaison to Muslim groups.

It is a sad day in this country when a public figure has to apologize for not showing equal amounts of attention to the ‘other side of a conflict’, especially when it’s a side he does not support. It’s all about moral relativism, folks. “Hezbollah’s done bad things, but so has Israel, so who is to say one is worse than the other? Let’s all form a circle and have a group hug and sing Kumbaya. Can’t we all just get along?”

*SIGH*

More/Related: What are the moonbats in the UK doing to combat Israel’s fight against Hezbollah? Gateway Pundit explains, with photos included. In a nutshell, seven anti-war ‘activists’ were arrested in Scotland after sneaking aboard a US military plane – in order to look for weapons the US may be shipping to Israel.

Hmm. I guess that means that the anti-war nuts that were involved in this are ok with Hezbollah continuing to fire at Israel, they just don’t want Israel to have the ability to defend itself. That doesnt’ sound anti-war to me – just anti-Israel. Apparently anti-war folks don’t mind wars as long as the side they’re rooting for has the more superior fire power.

Something tells me that Chris Hitchens, who has made this very point about ‘peace lovers’ in the past, would agree.

Go here for the latest on the conflict between Israel and Hezbollah.

Prior:

RSS feed for comments on this post.

8 Responses to “LA mayor apologizes for not being a moral relativist”

Comments

  1. Marshall Art says:

    Well, at least he condemned the Hezbollah attacks. Let’s wait and see if he softens this or not at the mosques.

  2. benning says:

    He will. He’s a Latino racist, part of La Raza.

  3. skip says:

    So, here we have the Mayor of Los Angeles making a gesture in the direction of a view embraced by a supermajority of the world—AFTER he he went to a pro-Israeli event— and you act as if he has committed a hate crime?

    It must be comfortable indeed to be so sure of your position that every contrary view is automatically that of a moron of an antisemite, but it must make travel outside the shtetl a bit of an ordeal.

    Mull that over in what you are pleased to call your minds.

  4. Baklava says:

    TOo vague and too many pronouns. Don’t know what you just said and to whom….

  5. I was thinking the same thing, Bak.

  6. Baklava says:

    We’re twins…

    oh no. That means we can’t date… :x

  7. Big Bang Hunter says:

    - Does anyone else see something a bit awkward for the Liberals in all of this. What happened to the hue and cry of “seperation of church and state” nattering we all have to indure from the party of Tolerance on a daily basis. I mean I thought it was verboten for public officials to be caught even thinking about endorsing any religious anything, period. Apparently it’s only alright as long as you do it for a “legitimate” identity group, as defined by our elite Progressives. They are so full of it. all things are possible, as long as it supports todays talking points. “Irony” and “hypocracy”, are missing from the Liberal dictionary.

    - Bang **==

  8. Mad Magazine once defined a liberal as someone who tries to see the other guy’s point of view while being mugged.