
| AP | 0 | |
| LV Now | 0 | |
| Seattle Times | 0 | |
| Fresno Bee | [CA] Field Poll: Campbell leads GOP Senate field; Boxer fades |
0 |
| WSJ | 0 |
Betsy Newmark, on female politicians:
Why should gender matter in politics today? Have we returned to the arguments from a century ago that women are more moral and will clean up politics? In the 2006 campaign, Pelosi argued that it might take a woman to clean out the House of Representatives, unconsciously echoing a 1912 cartoon showing a giant woman voter sweeping away corrupt politicians. What happened to all the feminists’ slogans about how there was no difference between women and men? Wasn’t it questioning just this idea that got Larry Summers into trouble?
Women can’t have it both ways. Either men and women are essentially the same, or each gender has certain strengths that the other lacks. If women are going to claim that they bring special gender-based skills to politics, men can start claiming that they, too, have particular strengths as leaders.
Exactly. Feministas for years have been arguing that men and women are no different than each other, can do the same things, etc but when it suits their arguments, they’ll claim that they can do something men supposedly can’t, meaning they have ’special strengths unique to women.’ Now just imagine if a Republican male candidate for president stated that in times of war, it was better for a man to lead the US military because men understood and could better handle the rough and tumble nature of the military? The verbal pounding he’d receive from NOW would be relentless. A Republican female making an argument that men were stronger than women in certain areas is typically labelled by the usual suspects as being ’subservient’ to their ‘masters’ or ‘brainwashed.’
Women and men were created equal, but they were also created to be different from one another (can you imagine how boring life would be if we were all alike?). The FemElites are notorious for falsely equating being “different” with being “unequal” – they couldn’t be further off the mark. There are things that men do better than women, and there are things that women do better than men, and there are things that both women and men do equally as well (and of course, there are exceptions to the rule, but that’s what they are: exceptions).
Am I saying that women should “know their place”? Hell no. But unlike the radical feminist hypocrites who embarass themselves every time they open their mouths with not just their doublespeak about ‘equality’ but also how we should ‘embrace diversity’ when it comes to race and culture, I truly DO embrace and celebrate many kinds of diversity – including the diversity between the sexes, which appears to be the only diversity that the feministas do not embrace. I love being a woman, and I love men who aren’t afraid to be men and there is nothing wrong with accepting and enjoying (and sometimes ranting about! LOL) our differences.
Radical feminist women have been getting away with this double standard for years. It’s up to women AND men who see the hypocrisy of this argument to call them on it when it happens, even at the risk of being shouted down with the obvious and predictable howls of outrage we’ve come to expect from those who don’t want their “Accepted Truths” challenged for fear that the basis of their whole movement could be called into question (gasp!). The chains of political correctness have served to hamper honest and frank debates on this issue for years, and that must change.
Hat tip: Lorie Byrd
Prior/Related:
RSS feed for comments on this post.
© 2003 - 2010 Sister Toldjah • All Rights Reserved
Powered by: WordPress • Design by: E.Webscapes • Hosted by: Hosting Matters
I could not agree more.
And now I will stick my neck out and extrapolate from the above post.
Remember the stink from the comments of Jimmy the Greek? If you don’t know who he is, it’s a measure of how badly he got impaled due to comments regarding differences between the races. He was no orator, and there was a crassness in his verbiage, but it made me think about what differences are obvious (skin color, facial features, etc.) and wonder if perhaps there were other differences less noticeable. For example, if a test of ability was done using a massive sampling of three races, white, black and asian and the tests were math, science and perhaps reading, wouldn’t it seem logical that there’d be different strengths between the races? Maybe the asians always tests better in one subject, the black in another and the white in the remaining. So what? Superiority isn’t established, only the differences being defined and understood. Equality, however, would still exist. And it wouldn’t have to be subjects as listed, but maybe other areas of ability. Would it mean more than the differences between a short guy and a tall guy? Each of those have abilities the other doesn’t have due to their respective heights. Anyway, I was just thinking…
Actually, dear, the reason women can bring some fresh insight into politics is the same reason we view military experience as a plus when it comes to aspects of foreign relations. This has to nothing to do with some in-built essence of people, but is simply a function of experience.
jpe states:
Actually, dear, the reason women can bring some fresh insight into politics is the same reason we view military experience as a plus when it comes to aspects of foreign relations. This has to nothing to do with some in-built essence of people, but is simply a function of experience.
Ok, I will grant you the military have experience when dealing with foriegn problems (not relations), diplomats do not a military experience make.
But, you have not said WHAT womanly insights women bring to politics that more than a man…care to elude jpe?
Are we now pejudicing politics in favor of one specific gender? By the way, your military anaolgy would have been pretty good, IF you were not talking about job experience vs gender.
It’s one thing to promote or support someone based on their experience, but to do so just because of gender, religous beliefs or the color of their skin is called something else….