Intolerant liberal professors news

Posted by: Sister Toldjah on April 14, 2006 at 9:40 pm

There are two stories I want to discuss in this post, stories that add more proof in the evidence file that the term “tolerant liberal” is an oxymoron.

First, from Ohio State University comes this letter written by the Alliance Defense Fund on behalf of OSU librarian Scott Savage who has been slapped with a ’sexual orientation harassment’ charge for – get this – recommending conservative books for freshman reading, two of which the professors in question apparently found offensive. Via the ADF:

Scott Savage, who serves as a reference librarian for the university, suggested four best-selling conservative books for freshman reading in his role as a member of OSU Mansfield’s First Year Reading Experience Committee. The four books he suggested were The Marketing of Evil by David Kupelian, The Professors by David Horowitz, Eurabia: The Euro-Arab Axis by Bat Ye’or, and It Takes a Family by Senator Rick Santorum. Savage made the recommendations after other committee members had suggested a series of books with a left-wing perspective, by authors such as Jimmy Carter and Maria Shriver.

Just where does the ’sexual orientation harassment’ part of all this come into play? Via Eugene Volokh:

The professors claim in a formal complaint filed with OSU that this suggestion, and the librarian’s arguments in its defense (which were apparently not otherwise anti-gay, not that this should matter), create a “hostile environment” for them based on their sexual orientation. (The complaint has been referred to as a sexual harassment complaint, but it’s really a sexual orientation harassment complaint, see the first paragraph on page 2 of the Ohio State harassment policy.)

Back to the ADL letter:

Savage was put under “investigation” by OSU’s Office of Human Resources after three professors filed a complaint of discrimination and harassment against him, saying that the book suggestions made them feel “unsafe.” The complaint came after the OSU Mansfield faculty voted without dissent to file charges against Savage. The faculty later voted to allow the individual professors to file charges.

This is absolutely insane. It’s nuts that OSU would take the complaints remotely seriously (he recommmended two books that were pro-family and frowned on homosexuality and two profs freak out because the books “create a hostile environment” which would make them feel “unsafe”? GMADB!). Not only that, but hello – first amendment?

Maybe these two profs should adopt a motto: “tolerance for me but not for thee!”

More commentary on this can be read via Tigerhawk, Ace of Spades, Tammy Bruce (must-read!), Jawa Report, Riehl World View

The second story comes out of Northern Kentucky University, where a professor there actually encouraged students to destroy a pro-life display – a display that NKU officials approved:

HIGHLAND HEIGHTS – A professor at Northern Kentucky University said she invited students in one of her classes to destroy an anti-abortion display on campus Wednesday evening.

NKU police are investigating the incident, in which 400 crosses were removed from the ground near University Center and thrown in trash cans. The crosses, meant to represent a cemetery for aborted fetuses, had been temporarily erected last weekend by a student Right to Life group with permission from NKU officials.

Public universities cannot ban such displays because they are a type of symbolic speech that has been protected by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Witnesses reported “a group of females of various ages” committing the vandalism about 5:30 p.m., said Dave Tobertge, administrative sergeant with the campus police.

Sally Jacobsen, a longtime professor in NKU’s literature and language department, said the display was dismantled by about nine students in one of her graduate-level classes.

“I did, outside of class during the break, invite students to express their freedom-of-speech rights to destroy the display if they wished to,” Jacobsen said.

Asked whether she participated in pulling up the crosses, the professor said, “I have no comment.”

She said she was infuriated by the display, which she saw as intimidating and a “slap in the face” to women who might be making “the agonizing and very private decision to have an abortion.’”

Jacobsen said it originally wasn’t clear who had placed the crosses on campus.

She said that could make it appear that NKU endorsed the message.

Pulling up the crosses was similar to citizens taking down Nazi displays on Fountain Square, she said.

“Any violence perpetrated against that silly display was minor compared to how I felt when I saw it. Some of my students felt the same way, just outraged,” Jacobsen said.

Which meant it was perfectly ok for you and your students to go out and literally walk all over someone else’s free speech rights, right, Prof. Jacobsen?

For the record, Jacobsen actually did participate in the destruction of the pro-life display. See the first photo on this page.

Hat tip for the NKU links: Michelle Malkin.

Are there anymore questions now from those who doubt that conservatives feel repressed on college campuses across America?

Read more via Six Meat Buffet, Kim Priestap at Wizbang, Rhymes With Right, Texas Rainmaker, Center for Sanity, Stop The ACLU, Shape of Days

Related Toldjah So posts on left wing educational nonsense:

RSS feed for comments on this post.

41 Responses to “Intolerant liberal professors news”

Comments

  1. Dave in CO says:

    So, evidently to Leftist totalitarians like steve, violence and the infringement of rights is acceptable if it is in support of steve’s own opinion but wrong if it demonstrates against steve’s opinion. So, his whole non-violence spew is a fraud.

  2. Judith says:

    Hey Peace-ful Steve, Please stand in front of me and mine when the terrorist arrive at our shores. I want you to give the first hug. :d

  3. Judith says:

    Oh, and Steve peace-ful, its we asshats, not us asshats. School must have been hard for you.:-w

  4. Judith says:

    Edited – insult. Let’s get beyond these kinds of suggestions, please. –ST

  5. steve says:

    “Judy,Judy,Judy…”. Stuffing the crosses into the ground was meant as a provocative act and was taken that way. Yin/Yang. No, the crosses should not have been destroyed, they should have added 2000, to them and created a memorial to honor bush’s Iraq war dead. The point of the article was the fact that the provocative actions, neither provocative action, was sanctioned by the university. “Judy,Judy,Judy…”, I’ll bet your Mom’s proud? Peace

  6. forest hunter says:

    If and when you should learn anything moron, I certainly hope honor would be among them, for you are sorely in need.

  7. steve says:

    He has honor if he holds himself to an ideal of conduct though it is incovenient,unprofitable, or dangerous to do so. Lippmann. Maybe you mean “ideal of conduct” and not “honor”. Peace

  8. forest hunter says:

    Are you adressing the “…..ideal of conduct though it is inconvenient, unprofitable or dangerous to do so.”,in reference to the Islamofascist splodidopes or dhimmidummies swamping the left?

    I meant the word HONOR as I have referred to it many times before to you steve(fn), not the phrase you copied from someone elses mind.

  9. steve says:

    Your still confused,being non-violent is not a sign of weakness it’s a sign of strength. Peace

  10. sanity says:

    When you leave your protection to others, whom you castigate and belittle for being war-like, but hide behind because you are a ‘pacifist’, is not strength.

    You draw your strength from the fact that you are protected from tyranny, that you have rights and protections that have been fought for, and are enforced through strength of arms.

    You can sit there and say being a pacifist is strength, but your strength comes on the backs of real men and women you hold the front line so you can sit on your ass and talk your gibberish.

    Without a military, we would not have a Country that we do now. Without a military, you would not have the freedoms you have now.

    If you think a piece of paper (US Constitution and Bill of Rights) are what gives you freedoms and the life you live, you are wrong. These important documents are nothing more than paper with words, without a military to protect and keep it.

  11. JAH says:

    To piggyback on what sanity said,

    War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse. The person who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself.

    John Stuart Mill